|មុននឹង proposing or creating a new |
|This page documents an English Wikipedia editing guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.|
|This page in a nutshell: An article too short to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub by adding a stub template from the list here to the end of the article. Anyone can edit a stub article, or remove a stub template from an article which is no longer a stub.|
|Manual of Style|
|- Stub types (sections)||talk|
|- Stub types (full list)||talk|
|- To do||talk|
|- Naming conventions||talk|
|- Stub redirects||talk|
|- Current month|
|- Current month|
|Article creation ⇧|
|Concepts and guides|
|Meta tools and groups|
The objective of this article is to provide a general guide for dealing with stubs, which are articles deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject. The first section, Basic information, contains information that is recommended for most users. The second half, Creating stub types contains more specialized material.
NOTE: This page is NOT for proposing new stub articles. To do that, please visit វិគីភីឌា:Articles for creation.
អត្ថបទខ្លីមិនពេញលេញ គឺជាអត្ថបទមួយដែលមានខ្លឹមសារខ្លី មិនទាន់ពេញលេញនៅឡើយ ហើយជាទូទៅ មានត្រឹមថា ២-៣ឃ្លា ល្បះ ឬកថាខណ្ឌខ្លី ដែលមានអត្ថន័យខ្លឹមសារល្អ ប៉ុន្តែនៅតិចតូច ខ្លីពេគ និងមិនទាន់គ្រប់គ្រាន់ too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and which is capable of expansion. Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they lack
While a " definition" may be enough to qualify an article as a stub, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The distinction between dictionary and encyclopedia articles is best expressed by the use–mention distinction:
There is no set size at which an article stops being a stub. While very short articles are likely to be stubs, there are some subjects about which there is very little that can be written. Conversely, there are subjects about which a lot could be written – their articles may still be stubs even if they are a few paragraphs long. As such, it is impossible to state whether an article is a stub based solely on its length, and any decision on the article has to come down to an editor's best judgement (the user essay on the Croughton-London rule may be of use when trying to judge whether an article is a stub). Similarly, stub status usually depends on the length of prose text alone – lists, templates, images, and other such peripheral parts of an article are usually not considered when judging whether an article is a stub.
Any registered editor may start a stub article.
When you write a stub, bear in mind that it should contain enough information for other editors to expand upon it. The key is to provide adequate context—articles with little or no context usually end up being speedily deleted. Your initial research may be done either through books or reliable websites. You may also contribute knowledge acquired from other sources, but it is useful to conduct some research beforehand, in order to ensure that your facts are accurate and unbiased. Use your own words: directly copying other sources without giving them credit is plagiarism, and may in some cases be a violation of copyright.
Begin by defining or describing your topic. Avoid fallacies of definition. Write clearly and informatively. State, for example, what a person is famous for, where a place is located and what it is known for, or the basic details of an event and when it happened.
Next, try to expand upon this basic definition. Internally link relevant words, so that users unfamiliar with the subject can understand what you have written. Avoid linking words needlessly; instead, consider which words may require further definition for a casual reader to understand the article. Lastly, a critical step: add
sources for the information you have put into the stub; see
Once you create and save the article, other editors will also be able to enhance it.
After writing a short article, or finding an unmarked stub, you should insert a stub template. Choose from among the templates listed at វិគីភីឌា:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types.
This is placed at the end of the article, after the External links section, any navigation templates, and the category tags, so that the stub category will appear after all article content but before any
Stub templates have two parts: a short message noting the stub's topic and encouraging editors to expand it, and a category link, which places the article in a stub category alongside other stubs on the same topic. The naming for stub templates usually topic-stub; a list of these templates may be found here. You need not learn all the templates—even simply adding helps (see this essay for more information). The more accurately an article is tagged, however, the less work it is for other sorters later, and the more useful it is for editors looking for articles to expand.
If an article overlaps several stub categories, more than one template may be used, but it is strongly recommended that only those relating to the subject's main notability be used. A limit of three or, if really necessary, four stub templates is advised.
Stub-related activities are centralised at
Once a stub has been properly expanded and becomes a larger article, any editor may remove its stub template. No
Many articles still marked as stubs have in fact been expanded beyond what is regarded as stub size. If an article is too large to be considered a stub but still needs expansion, the stub template may be removed and appropriate templates may be added (no article should contain both a stub template and an expand template).
Be bold in removing stub tags that are clearly no longer applicable.