Settled since the early Bronze Age, Hatay was once part of the
Akkadian Empire, then the
Amorite Kingdom of
Mitannis, then a succession of
Neo-Hittite "Hattena" people that later gave the modern province of Hatay its name, then the
Assyrians (except a brief occupation by
Persians. The region was the center of the Hellenistic
Seleucid empire, home to the four Greek cities of the
Syrian tetrapolis (Antioch,
Laodicea). From 64 BC onwards the city of Antioch became an important regional centre of the
The area was conquered by the
Rashidun Caliphate in 638 and later it came under the control of the
Arab dynasties. From the 11th century onwards, the region was controlled by the
Hamdanids after a brief rule of
Ikhshidids. In 969 the city of
Antioch was recaptured by the
Byzantine Empire. It was conquered by
Philaretos Brachamios, a Byzantine general in 1078. He founded a principality from Antioch to
Edessa. It was captured by
Suleiman I, who was Sultan of Rum (ruler of Anatolian Seljuks), in 1084. It passed to
Tutush I, Sultan of Aleppo (ruler of Syria Seljuks), in 1086. Seljuk rule lasted 14 years until Hatay's capture by the Crusaders in 1098, when it became the centre of the
Principality of Antioch. Hatay was captured from the Crusaders by the
Mameluks in 1268.
Sanjak of Alexandretta
By the time it was taken from the Mameluks by the
Selim I in 1516, Antakya was a medium-sized town on 2 km² of land between the
Orontes River and Mount Habib Neccar. Under the Ottomans the area was known as the sanjak (or governorate) of Alexandretta.
Gertrude Bell in her book Syria The Desert & the Sown published in 1907 wrote extensively about her travels across Syria including Antioch & Alexandretta and she noted the heavy mix between Turks and Arabs in the region at that time. A map published circa 1911 highlighted that the ethnic make up (Alexandretta) was majority Arab with smaller communities of Armenians and Turks.
Ethnic groups in the Balkans and Asia Minor, early 20th Century, Historical Atlas
Many consider that Alexandretta had been traditionally part of Syria. Maps as far back as 1764 confirm this.
 During the First World War in which the Ottoman Empire was defeated most of Syria was occupied by the British forces. But when the
Armistice of Mudros was signed at the end of the war, Hatay was a still part of the Ottoman Empire. Nevertheless, after the armistice it was occupied by the British forces an operation which was never accepted by the Ottoman side. Later like the rest of Syria it was handed to France by the British Empire.
After World War I and the
Turkish War of Independence, the
Ottoman Empire was disbanded and the modern Republic of
Turkey was created, and Alexandretta was not part of the new republic, it was put within the
French mandate of Syria after a signed agreement between the Allies and Turkey, the
Treaty of Sèvres, which was neither ratified by the
Ottoman parliament nor by the
Turkish National Movement in Ankara.
 The subsequent
Treaty of Lausanne also put Alexandretta within Syria. The document detailing the boundary between Turkey and Syria around 1920 and subsequent years is presented in a report by the Official Geographer of The Bureau of Intelligence and Research of the US Department of State.
 A French-Turkish treaty of 20 October 1921 rendered the Sanjak of Alexandretta autonomous, and remained so from 1921 to 1923. Out of 220,000 inhabitants in 1921, 87,000 were Turks.
 Along with Turks the population of the Sanjak included:
Arabs of various religious denominations (
Armenians. In 1923 Hatay was attached to the
State of Aleppo, and in 1925 it was directly attached to the
French mandate of Syria, still with special administrative status.
Turkish borders according to the Treaty of Lausanne, 1923
Despite this, a Turkish community remained in Alexandretta, and
Mustafa Kemal said that Hatay had been a Turkish homeland for 4,000 years. This was due to the contested nationalist
Sun Language Theory prevalent in the 1930s in Turkey, which presumed that some ancient peoples of Anatolia and the Middle East such as the Sumerians and Hittites, hence the name Hatay, were related to the Turks. In truth, the Turks first appeared in Anatolia during the 11th century when the
Seljuk Turks occupied the eastern province of the
Abbasid Empire and captured Baghdad.
 Resident Arabs organised under the banner of Arabism, and in 1930,
Zaki al-Arsuzi, a teacher and lawyer from Arsuz on the coast of Alexandretta published a newspaper called 'Arabism' in Antioch that was shut down by Turkish and French authorities.
The 1936 elections returned two MPs favouring the independence of Syria from France, and this prompted communal riots as well as passionate articles in the Turkish and Syrian press. This then became the subject of a complaint to the
League of Nations by the Turkish government concerning alleged mistreatment of the Turkish populations. Atatürk demanded that Hatay become part of Turkey claiming that the majority of its inhabitants were Turks. However, the French High Commission estimated that the population of 220,000 inhabitants was made up of 46% Arabs (28% Alawites, 10% Sunni, 8% Christians), 39%
 while the remaining 4% was made up of
 The sanjak was given autonomy in November 1937 in an arrangement brokered by the League. Under its new statute, the sanjak became 'distinct but not separated' from the
French mandate of Syria on the diplomatic level, linked to both France and Turkey for defence matters.
Turkish forces under Colonel
Şükrü Kanatlı entered
on July 5, 1938.
On 2 September 1938, as the Second World War loomed over Europe, the assembly proclaimed the
Hatay State. It lasted for one year under joint French and Turkish military supervision. The name "Hatay" itself was proposed by Atatürk, and the government was under Turkish control. The president
Tayfur Sökmen was a member of Turkish parliament elected in 1935 (representing
Antalya), and the prime minister
Abdurrahman Melek was also elected to the Turkish parliament (representing Gaziantep) in 1939 while still holding the prime-ministerial post.
Hatay Province of Turkey
On 29 June 1939, following a
referendum, Hatay became a Turkish province. This referendum has been labelled both "phoney" and "rigged", and a way for the French to let Turks take over the area, hoping that they would turn on Hitler.
 For the referendum, Turkey moved tens of thousands of Turks into Alexandretta to vote.
 These were Turks born in Hatay who were now living elsewhere in Turkey. In two government communiqués in 1937 and 1938, the Turkish government asked all local government authorities to make lists of their employees originally from Hatay. Those listed were then sent to Hatay to register as citizens and vote.
Hashim al-Atassi resigned in protest at continued French intervention in Syrian affairs, maintaining that the French were obliged to refuse the annexation under the
Franco-Syrian Treaty of Independence of 1936.
Hassa district of Gaziantep,
Dörtyol district of Adana and
Erzin were then incorporated into Hatay. As a result of the annexation, a number of demographic changes occurred in Hatay. During the six months following the annexation, inhabitants over the age of 18 were given the right to choose between staying and becoming Turkish citizens, or emigrate to and acquire citizenship in the French Mandate of Syria or Greater Lebanon. If choosing emigration, they were given 18 months to bring in their movable assets and establish themselves in their new states. Almost half of the Sunni Arabs left. Many Armenians also left and 1,068 Armenian families were relocated from the six Armenian villages of
Musa Dagh to
Beqaa Valley in
Lebanon. Many of the Armenians had been prior victims to the
Armenian Genocide committed by Ottoman Empire that had fled for their lives to the French Mandate of Syria. The total number of people who left for Syria is estimated at 50,000 including 22,000 Armenians, 10,000 Alawites, 10,000 Sunni Arabs and 5,000 Arab Christians.
In Ottoman times, Hatay was part of the
Vilayet of Aleppo in
Ottoman Syria. After World War I, Hatay (then known as
Alexandretta) became part of the
French Mandate of Syria. Unlike other regions historically belonging to Syrian provinces (such as
Urfa) , Alexandretta was confirmed as Syrian territory in the
Treaty of Lausanne agreed upon by
Kemal Atatürk; although it was granted a special autonomous status because it contained a large Turkish minority. However, culminating a series of border disputes with France-mandated Syria, Atatürk obtained in 1937 an agreement with France recognizing Alexandretta as an independent state, and in 1939 this state, called the
Republic of Hatay, was annexed to Turkey as the 63rd Turkish province following a controversial referendum. Syria bitterly disputed both the separation of Alexandretta and its subsequent annexation to Turkey.
Syria maintains that the separation of Alexandretta violated France's mandatory responsibility to maintain the unity of Syrian lands (article 4 of the mandate charter). It also disputes the results of the referendum held in the province because, according to a League of Nations commission that registered voters in Alexandretta in 1938, Turkish voters in the province represented no more than 46% of the population.
 Syria continues to consider Hatay part of its territory, and shows it as such on its maps.
 However, Turkey and Syria have
strengthened their ties and opened the border between the two countries.
Protests in Damascus in 1939 by women demonstrators against the secession of the Sanjak of Alexandretta, and its subsequent joining into Turkey as the Hatay Province. One of the signs reads: "Our blood is sacrificed for the Syrian Arab Sanjak."
Syrians hold the view that this land was illegally ceded to Turkey by France, the mandatory occupying power of Syria in the late 1930s. Syria still considers it an integral part of its own territory. Syrians call this land Liwa' aliskenderun (
Arabic: لواء الاسكندرون) rather than the Turkish name of Hatay. Official Syrian maps still show Hatay as part of Syria.
Under the leadership of Syrian President
Bashar al Assad from 2000 onwards there was a lessening of tensions over the Hatay issue. Indeed, in early 2005, when visits from Turkish President
Ahmet Necdet Sezer and Turkish prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan opened a way to discussions between two states, it was claimed that the Syrian government announced it had no claims to sovereignty concerning Hatay any more. On the other hand, there has been no official announcement by the Syrians relinquishing their rights of sovereignty.
Following changes to Turkish land registry legislation in 2003 a large number of properties in Hatay were purchased by Syrian nationals, mostly people who had been residents of Hatay since the 1930s but had retained their Syrian citizenship and were buying the properties that they already occupied. By 2006 the amount of land owned by Syrian nationals in Hatay exceeded the legal limit for foreign ownership of 0.5%, and
sale of lands to foreigners was prohibited.
There has been a policy of cross border co-operation, on the social and economic level, between Turkey and Syria in the recent years. This allowed families divided by the border to freely visit each other during the festive periods of
Eid. In December 2007 up to 27,000 people crossed the border to visit their brethren on the other side.
 In the wake of an agreement in the autumn of 2009 to lift visa requirements, nationals of both countries can travel freely.
 However, out of 50 agreements signed between Turkey and Syria in December 2009, the Hatay dispute stalled a water agreement over the
Euphrates Rivers. Turkey asked Syria to publicly recognize Hatay as a Turkish territory before signing on to the agreement.
Apart from maps showing Hatay as Syrian territory, the Syrian policy has been to avoid discussing Hatay and giving evasive answers when asked to specify Syrian future goals and ambitions with regard to the area. This has included a complete media silence on the issue.
 In February 2011 the dispute over Hatay was almost solved. The border separating Syria from Hatay was going to be blurred by a shared Friendship Dam on the Orontes river and as part of this project the two states had agreed on the national jurisdiction on each side of the border. Only weeks before the outbreak of the Syrian uprising and later war, groundbreaking ceremonies were held in Hatay and Idlib. As a result of the Syrian war and the extremely tense Turkish-Syrian relations it brought, construction was halted. As part of the ongoing war, the question of the sovereignty of Hatay has resurfaced in Syria and the Syrian media silence has been broken. Syrian media began broadcasting documentaries on the history of the area, the Turkish annexation and "Turkification" policies. Syrian newspapers have also reported on demonstrations in Hatay and on organizations and parties in Syria demanding an "end to the Turkish occupation".
 However, although the Syrian government has repeatedly criticized the Turkish policies towards Syria and the armed rebel groups operating on Syrian territory, it has not officially brought up the question of Hatay.